Go to Kentucky.gov home page
 KY Agencies  |  KY Services  |    for 
Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife

2003-04 RUFFED GROUSE

POPULATION STATUS REPORT

Grouse

KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

RESOURCES

Prepared by: John Morgan, Wildlife Biologist

 

INTRODUCTION

The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) utilizes three annual surveys to track the status of Kentucky’s grouse population: a drumming survey, grouse hunter cooperator survey, and a grouse wing collection survey. The Drumming Survey and Hunter Log Cooperator Survey provide an independent index of the grouse population trend. The wing collection survey provides information about the age and sex ratio of the harvest.

Kentucky’s 2003-04 ruffed grouse hunting season began Nov. 10, 2002 and ended Feb. 29, 2003 (112 days). Hunters were able to pursue grouse in 53 eastern Kentucky counties. An early grouse season was open on 7 wildlife management areas (WMA) from Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, 2003 (90 days). Those WMAs included Beaver Creek, Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Cane Creek, Clay, Fleming, and Lake Cumberland.

 

GROUSE POPULATION STATUS

Drumming Survey – From a low in 2000, the number of drummers increased in 2001 and again in 2002, however in 2003, numbers plummeted because most routes were not completed (Figure 1). Fortunately, most of routes were completed in 2004 and drummers were up markedly (Appendix A). Actually, the increase was 140%! The overall trend is steadily declining which is likely caused by the lack of forest disturbance. Many survey stops were once characterized by dense understories, but over time, they have developed into more mature stands. The 2004 result of 5.6 drummers per 100 stops is well below the long-term average of 8.3 drummers.

Figure 1

 

Flush Rate – The flush rate increased by 20% in the 2003-04 season compared to the previous season (Figure 2). The 2003-04 flush rate of 0.91 birds per hour was just below the long-term average of 0.93 birds per hour. The overall trend of the grouse population based on flush rates is slowly decreasing. Flush rate data are the most reliable indicator of the grouse population if sample sizes are adequate.

Figure 2

HUNT AND HARVEST DYNAMICS

Hunt Characteristics - Hunter log cooperators (n=27) reported data from 362 hunts in 2003-04. The typical hunt was 3.5 hours long consisting of roughly 2 hunters. Dogs (average of 1.9 dogs/hunt) were used 98% of the time, and hunting parties harvested 0.6 grouse/hunt. Hunting effort increased steadily as the season advanced (Figure 3). Also, as the season progressed, hunters flushed more grouse/hour, but the harvest remained fairly constant (Figure 4).

Figure 3

 

Figure 4

Harvest Age and Sex Ratio – The percentage of adult and juvenile grouse in the harvest is an indirect measure of reproductive success. Hunters who submitted wings and rump feathers of harvested grouse helped us attain an estimate of the number of juvenile grouse killed per adult hen (Figure 5). The 2003-04 season estimate of 5.04 was higher than the long-term average of 3.99. Males comprised 51% of the harvest, whereas females were 31% of the harvest. Eighteen percent of the collected wings and rump feathers could not be sexed.

In general, the proportion of juveniles in the harvest is a poor indicator of population trend. For example, the highest recorded proportion of juveniles killed per adult hen occurred during the 1998-99 season. However, the flush rate that same season was the third lowest recorded since the survey began. The contradiction implies that the wing data is unreliable unless there was extremely high rates of adult mortality, which was unlikely. Also, the increasing trend in production should correspond to a growing population, but the flush data shows otherwise. The inexperience of juveniles makes them more susceptible to harvest which further minimizes the reliability of the wing data.

Figure 5

OUTLOOK FOR THE 2004-05 GROUSE HUNTING SEASON

Kentucky grouse hunters can expect an above average hunting season overall. The early and warm spring may have improved chick survival and hen condition. Also, research has showed that the fall mast crop is linked to the productivity of hens. Simply, healthy hens lay better eggs and are better able to raise a brood. Last fall’s mast survey showed the highest mast production in 20 years, so we are excited about the possibilities for this year. As always, there will be local areas where grouse are plentiful, and areas where grouse are scarce. Do you your homework, and give your boots a workout to find birds.

ADDITIONAL HELP IS NEEDED

Grouse hunters can improve the survey information used to track Kentucky’s grouse population. First, more participants are needed. Please prompt your friends and neighbors to track their hunts and pass that information on to KDFWR. Forms are available from the Department (1-800-858-1549) or from the hunting regulations guide. Forms are also available from the Department website (http://fw.ky.gov) under "Grouse" in the small game section of "Hunting". We remain pleased with the Hunter Log Cooperator Survey and hope to see it expand with every passing season. If you submit wings, please remember to fill out a hunting log, too. If you choose to only participate in one survey, then complete the hunting log. We get the best and most reliable data from those efforts. The KDFWR Wildlife Division sincerely thanks the grouse hunters who have participated in the grouse surveys for many years. Your dedication makes this report possible and helps track grouse populations across the state.

Appendix A. Kentucky Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey Results (Drummers heard from a station on both survey days assumed the same.)

 

Number of Individual Drumming Grouse by Year

Route Name

County

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Bluegrass Region

                                 

Harrison County

Harrison

4

6

9

4

2

2

3

3

5

-

0

0

0

-

-

-

Madison County

Madison

-

2

3

5

0

5

-

3

3

0

2

0

0

-

-

-

Lapland WMA

Meade

1

1*

2

-

1

2

2

0

1

1

0

0

0

-

-

-

Northeast Region

                                 

Bracken County

Bracken

1

0

0

1

0

0

-

-

-

-

2

1

0

2

0

0

Grayson Lake WMA

Carter

4

3

3

3

1+

6

7

1

0

1

1

0

4*

1

0

1

Fleming WMA

Fleming

5

5

7

4

0+

1

0

2

3

2

2

3

4

5

-

1

Paintsville Lake WMA

Johnson

-

-

2

8*

8

6

1

2

3

1*

1

2

5

2

0*

1

Yatesville Lake WMA

Lawrence

3

5

5

4

6

7

2

3

0

2

1

0

1

1

1

5

Clay WMA

Nicholas

4

3

2

3

3

2

3

2

1

5

-

4

2

-

-

-

Fishtrap WMA

Pike

6

3

1

1

12

8

4

7

4

6

4

2

6

6

-

3

Daniel Boone NF

Rowan

1

4

4

2

2

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

2

2

2

3

Southeast Region

                                 

Greenbriar Ridge

Adair

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-

-

Addington

Breathitt

-

-

-

-

-

-

9

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Robinson Forest

Breathitt

-

-

-

-

-

-

5

0

-

-

-

5

2

-

-

-

Beech Creek

Clay

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

0

0

-

1

1

1

0

1

2

Black Mountain

Harlan

3

9

2

7

10

5

8

-

4

2

3

2

2

2

-

-

Mill Creek WMA

Jackson

2

2

2

3

1

2

3

2

1

1

3

3

3

3

0

2

War Fork

Jackson

4

4

3

2

0

4

2

1

2

2

3

2

3

4

1

2

Quicksand

Knott/
Breathitt

-

-

2*

7

4

3

6

-

2

-

3

2

1

0

-

-

Cane Creek

Laurel

-

-

0*

2

1

0

0

1

1

1

4

1

3

3

2

2

Redbird WMA

Leslie/
Clay

-

6

16

-

7

11

9

3

-

2

3

1*

5

9

-

-

Pine Mountain WMA

Letcher/
Harlan

2

1

4

2

2

2

1

5

2

1

1

0

2

-

-

2

South Fork

McCreary

3

-

2

1

2

2

3

1

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

Buck Knob

McCreary/
Pulaski

0

-

1

1

1

0

0

1

2

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

Blue Diamond Coal

Perry

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

2

3

4

-

0

Tunnel Ridge

Powell

5

6

3*

6

3

4

0

5

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Total Drummersa

 

53

65

75

67

63

73

69

43

39

30

39

31

49

44

8

25

a Total number of drumming males observed. Includes drummers heard at a station both days of the survey, so summation of the column will not equal

the total number.

* Route only run on one day.

+ Route was run after the first two weeks of April.

Privacy | Disclaimer | Individuals with Disabilities