2003-04 Rabbit Hunter Cooperator Survey Report

Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources
Prepared by: John Morgan, Wildlife Biologist
Introduction
The Rabbit Hunter Cooperator Report is a summary of 2 annual surveys
conducted by the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) to
estimate rabbit production, hunter effort, and hunter success. First, the Rabbit
Hunter Log Survey is a diary-type hunting log used to record information
including date of hunt, county hunted, hours hunted, number of hunters, number
of dogs, number of eastern cottontail rabbits, swamp rabbits, and Appalachian
cottontail rabbits (jumped, harvested, and wounded). Volunteer hunters were
asked to keep the log to date as the hunting season progressed. At the season's
conclusion, they mailed the log to KDFWR for analysis. The Mail Carrier Survey
represents the second survey employed to monitor rabbit populations across the
state. Volunteer mail carriers recorded rabbit observations as they traveled
their rural delivery routes during the last full week (6 delivery days) of July.
Survey cards provided space for observations of young and adult rabbits for each
of the survey days. Observers also recorded the number of days surveyed, the
length of the route, and the total miles driven. The mail carrier data is used
to forecast the upcoming hunting season, monitor the population, and estimate
rabbit productivity. Volunteer postal workers are issued a free subscription of Kentucky
Afield magazine for their support, whereas volunteer hunters received their
log from the previous season, a new log form, this report, and a gift for their
participation.
- Rabbit Hunter Log Survey
Hunting logs were received from 105 hunters
who averaged 15 hunting trips for the season.
Data were grouped into weekly and monthly subsets and physiographic region
subsets (Appendix A) to identify trends within the season and across the
state. From 1,593 logged hunts, the average hunt included jumping 6 rabbits,
harvesting 2 rabbits, and spending 3.7 hours afield with 2.4 hunters. Hunters
recorded hunts in 93 counties across the state
(Appendix B), and they used an average of 4 dogs per hunt. Nearly every hunt
(99%) included dogs.
The last 3 hunter log surveys revealed similar trends in hunter effort.
Hunters averaged approximately 16 hunts/year, and hunting pressure decreased
as the season progressed (Figure 1). Peaks of hunting were at the beginning of
the season, Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, and the close of the season
in the Eastern zone. Monthly subsets revealed the proportion of hunts and the
proportion of harvest were quite similar, but later season hunts (January and
February) were slightly less productive (Figure 2). Cooperator numbers are
fluctuating, and last year our cooperators increased by 6% (Table 1).


Table 1. Summary statistics from the Rabbit Hunter Log Survey in Kentucky,
2001-2004.
|
Statistics |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
|
Cooperators |
117 |
99 |
105 |
|
Hunts |
1,870 |
1,589 |
1,593 |
|
Counties |
103 |
99 |
93 |
|
Hunts/Hunter |
16 |
16 |
15 |
|
Hours Hunted |
6,857 |
6,037.5 |
5,847.9 |
|
Dogs Used |
7,396 |
6,755 |
6,883 |
|
Total Rabbits Jumped |
13,758 |
11,276 |
10,126 |
|
Total Rabbits Harvested |
6,198 |
5,129 |
4,222 |
|
Total Rabbits Wounded |
318 |
226 |
259 |
|
Hunting Mortality (%) |
47 |
48 |
44 |
Total rabbits jumped averaged 6.4/hunt (1.7/hr), and rabbits harvested
averaged 2.7/hunt (0.7/hr). Compared to 2002-03, jump rates decreased by 11%,
whereas harvest rates decreased by 14%. Jump and harvest rates remained fairly
constant throughout the season (Figure 3). Additionally, the jump and harvest
rates by species varied little over the last three seasons except for
Appalachian cottontails (Table 2). However, sample sizes for Appalachian
cottontails are far too low to indicate any change in the population or hunter
effort and success. Harvest and jump rates by species were calculated by the
following assumptions: 1) if Appalachian cottontail or swamp rabbits were
jumped, it was assumed Appalachian or swamp rabbits were being hunted, 2) if
eastern cottontails were jumped and an Appalachian cottontail or swamp rabbit
was jumped, it was assumed the Appalachian cottontail or swamp rabbit was
being hunted, and 3) if no rabbits were jumped, it was assumed the eastern
cottontail rabbit was being hunted (because cottontails comprise 98% of the
harvest and are the most common).

Table 2. Rabbit jump and harvest rates by species in
Kentucky, 2001-2004.
|
|
Eastern |
Swamp |
Appalachian |
|
Year |
01-02 |
02-03 |
03-04 |
01-02 |
02-03 |
03-04 |
01-02 |
02-03 |
03-04 |
|
Total Hunts |
1,818 |
1,535 |
1,533 |
240 |
49 |
53 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
|
Jumped/Hunt |
7.36 |
7.02 |
6.27 |
4.86 |
4.39 |
4.25 |
0.69 |
1.60 |
4.14 |
|
Jumped/Hour |
2.02 |
1.87 |
1.73 |
0.99 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
2.75 |
0.40 |
0.94 |
|
Harvested/Hunt |
3.31 |
3.21 |
2.65 |
2.27 |
1.94 |
1.62 |
0.38 |
0.60 |
1.29 |
|
Harvested/Hour |
0.91 |
0.85 |
0.73 |
0.46 |
0.40 |
0.35 |
1.50 |
0.15 |
0.29 |
|
Wounded/Hunt |
0.17 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.23 |
0.06 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
|
Wounded/Hour |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.05 |
0.25 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
Over the past three hunting seasons, hunting mortality (harvested and
wounded individuals) remained less than 50% of the rabbits jumped (Table 1).
Wound rates (2%) have remained constant as well. Cottontail rabbits continue
to dominate the harvest as expected (Figure 4).

We have a particular interest in reports of swamp and Appalachian
cottontail rabbits. Both species suffer from habitat loss and populations are
declining rangewide. Data from this year's hunting logs showed that
Appalachian cottontails were jumped 29 times and 9 rabbits were harvested.
Reports of Appalachian cottontails were significantly up this year, but our
sample size was too low to infer any change in population. This seasons
observations came from Lewis county. Swamp rabbits were jumped 223 times and
86 rabbits were harvested. Reports came from 12 western counties. Based on
data from hunter logs, swamp and eastern cottontail populations remain stable,
but both species experienced population booms in 1996 (Figure 5). Inadequate
sample sizes make annual comparisons of Appalachian cottontail data
impossible. Further investigation of swamp and Appalachian cottontail rabbits
may be required to identify existing population levels and locations.

The highest rabbit jump rates in the state were found in the Outer
Bluegrass, Eastern Pennyroyal, and Western Pennyroyal physiographic regions
(Figure 6). The Eastern Pennyroyal region had the highest harvest rates. None
of the regions stood apart as the best marksmen, but the Eastern Coalfield
region accounted for the dubious honor of the lowest proportion of jumped
rabbits harvested at a dismal 27%! The rest of state’s percentage of jumped
rabbits harvested ranged from 40 to 49%. Hunter participation was especially
low in Inner Bluegrass and Eastern Pennyroyal regions. Given the success of
the hunters reporting in Eastern Pennyroyal, the bulk of the cooperators may
have missed out on some good hunting!

- Mail Carrier Survey Results
So, what can we look forward to this season? The Mail Carrier Survey provides
a glimpse of what we can expect for the upcoming hunting season. The survey is
the oldest in the program being completed for 44 years. Although no population
estimates can be derived from this data, it does provide valuable trend
information showing whether the population is up, down, or stable.
In 2004, mail carriers returned 798 of the approximately 1,200 survey cards
issued, which corresponds to a 66.5% response rate. Rural carriers covered
256,713 miles and observed 5,565 rabbits. The statewide observation rate was
2.17 rabbits/100 miles traveled. Juvenile rabbits comprised 56% of the rabbit
observations compared to 59% juveniles in 2003.
Observations of rabbits/100 miles by physiographic region showed population
increases and decreases across the state (Table 3). The Jackson Purchase region
incurred a 43.6% increase in observation rate, whereas the Eastern Coalfield
region yielded a 9.7% decrease in observations. However, the net result was a
5.85% increase in observation rates across the state. The Outer Bluegrass,
Eastern Pennyroyal, and Eastern Coalfield physiographic regions were the only
regions that were higher than their long-term average observation rate.
Table 3. Mail Carrier indices and rates of change in Kentucky, 1961-2004.
Rabbits/100 miles Percent Change
|
Mean Mean
|
PHYS. REG. 1961-2004 2003 2004 2004/1961 – 2004 2004/2003
|
Jackson
|
Purchase 1.64 0.78 1.12 -31.7 +43.6
|
Western
|
Pennyroyal 2.08 1.69 1.87 -10.0 +10.7
|
Western
|
Coalfield 1.74 1.50 2.04 +17.2 +15.0
|
Inner
|
Bluegrass 2.30 1.49 1.79 -22.2 +20.1
|
Knobs-Outer
|
Bluegrass 2.56 2.51 2.62 +0.23 +4.4
|
Hills of
|
Bluegrass 2.51 2.09 2.12 -15.5 +1.4
|
Eastern
|
Pennyroyal 1.68 1.84 1.95 +16.1 +6.0
|
Eastern
|
Coalfield 2.76 2.99 2.73 -1.1 -9.7
|
|
Statewide 2.22 2.05 2.17 -2.3 +5.85 |
Over the last 44 years of this survey, the decline in the rabbit population
is evident (Figure 7). The severe drop in population levels following the
winters of 1977 and 1978 was dramatic and populations have not recovered. The
rabbit population trend corresponds to a 1.0 %
decline per year over the life of the survey. The overall drop in rabbit numbers
since the late 1960’s can be generally attributed to habitat loss because of
land use changes and cleaner agricultural practices. In 2004, the statewide
index increased again, and the last 5 surveys have been quite good.
Subsequently, rabbit populations have remained fairly stable for the last
decade.

Conclusion
The Mail Carrier Survey and the Rabbit Hunter Log Survey appear to be
tracking each other well. Therefore, we can make predictions based on the Mail
Carrier Survey results. Breaking down data by physiographic regions generally
makes predictions more difficult as sample sizes become smaller compromising
reliability. However, by combining physiographic regions into western (Jackson
Purchase, Western Coalfield, and Western Pennyroyal), central (Inner, Outer, and
Hills of the Bluegrass), and eastern (Eastern Pennyroyal and Eastern Coalfield)
zones, projections become a little clearer. With that in mind, the western zone
should experience an increase in hunting action, and the central zone should
have better success than last year as well. The eastern region is a little
murkier as the Eastern Pennyroyal was up and Eastern Coalfield was down.
However, despite the decline in the Eastern Pennyroyal physiographic region the
population level appears to be at or above the long-term average, so hunting
should be good.
Rabbit populations seem to be stabilizing across the state. Our survey
indices are showing oscillations characteristic of population stability. Upon
comparison, rabbit populations are far below those on the late 60's and early
70's. Fortunately, rabbits generally have small home ranges and localized
management should generate a positive response, but large-scale changes in the
cottontail rabbit population in Kentucky will require widespread management of
the agricultural environment. Swamp rabbits and Appalachian cottontails
requirements are much more difficult to attain particularly when habitat loss is
irreversible, so we continue to keep a watchful eye on both of those species.
Overall the 2003-04 rabbit season was fair to good. Over the last 20 years,
the population has remained fairly stable with bumps up and down. Last year,
jump rates were down 11%, and harvest rates were down 14%. We are optimistic
that this year will be better. Another positive note, we gained 6% of our
cooperators back last year, but continue hit up your friends and hunting
partners to participate. This report is evidence of your efforts at work, and
you can see that we can monitor the population with your help. Sportsman
continue to lead the way in conservation and funding, and we sincerely
appreciate your support! Have a safe and enjoyable rabbit hunting season and we
look forward to hearing how you did!